Editors:Borbála Göncz (CUB), Ágnes Győri (HUN-REN IS), Márta Kiss (HUN-REN GKAC) Attila Gulyás (HUN-REN CSS), László Lőrincz (CUB), Irmina Matonyte (MAL, Vilnius), Simon Milton (CUB), Jelena Pesic (Univ. of Beograd), Andrew Ryder (CUB)
Editor in Chief:Márton Medgyesi (CUB)
Editorial Board
Tamás Bartus (CUB), Éva Fodor (CEU), György Lengyel (CUB), László Letenyei (CUB), Beáta Nagy (CUB), Zoltán Szántó (CUB), Lilla Vicsek (CUB)
Advisory Board
Attila Bartha (CUB), Heinrich Best (Univ. of Jena), József Böröcz (Rutgers Univ.), Bruno Dallago (Univ. of Trento), Menno Fenger (Erasmus University, Rotterdam), Anuska Ferligoj (Univ. of Ljubljana), Max Haller (Univ. of Graz), John Higley (Univ. of Texas, Austin), Ildikó Husz (HUN-REN GKAC), Michal Illner (Inst. of Sociology, CAS, Prague), Csaba Jelinek (CEU), Zúza Kusa (Inst. of Sociology, SAS, Bratislava), Olga Kutsenko (Univ. of Kiev), Mihály Laki (HUN-REN IS), David Lane (Univ. of Cambridge), Mladen Lazic (Univ. of Beograd), József Péter Martin (TI, Budapest), Attila Melegh (CUB), Maria Nawojczyk (Univ. AGH, Cracow), Vadim Radaev (High School of Economics, Moscow), Jose Real-Dato (Univ. Almeira), Kinga Szabó-Tóth (Univ. Miskolc), Judit Takács (HUN-REN IS), Károly Takács (Linköping Univ.), István György Tóth (Tárki, Budapest), Camelia Florela Voinea (Univ. of Bucharest)
The personal factors in scientific collaboration: views held by Slovenian researchers
Franc Mali, Toni Pustovrh, Marjan Cugmas, Anuška Ferligoj
Abstract
Scientific collaboration (SC) has become a widespread feature of modern research work. While many social network studies address various aspects of SC, little attention has so far been given to the specific factors that motivate researchers to engage in SC at the individual level. In our article, we focus on the types and practices of SC that researchers in Slovenia engage in. We consider this topic by adopting a quantitative and qualitative methodological approach. The former was conducted through a web survey among active researchers, and the latter through in-depth interviews with a selected group of top researchers, i.e. intellectual leaders. Results show the extent of individual SC depends on the perceptions of researchers of the benefits of SC. Qualitative interviews additionally provide broader reflections on certain policy mechanisms that could better motivate Slovenian scientists to scientifically collaborate in the international arena.
Keywords
scientific collaboration, research cooperation, personal factors, scientific disciplines