Editors:Borbála Göncz (CUB), Ágnes Győri (HUN-REN IS), Márta Kiss (HUN-REN GKAC) Attila Gulyás (HUN-REN CSS), László Lőrincz (CUB), Irmina Matonyte (MAL, Vilnius), Simon Milton (CUB), Jelena Pesic (Univ. of Beograd), Andrew Ryder (CUB)
Editor in Chief:Márton Medgyesi (CUB)
Editorial Board
Tamás Bartus (CUB), Éva Fodor (CEU), György Lengyel (CUB), László Letenyei (CUB), Beáta Nagy (CUB), Zoltán Szántó (CUB), Lilla Vicsek (CUB)
Advisory Board
Attila Bartha (CUB), Heinrich Best (Univ. of Jena), József Böröcz (Rutgers Univ.), Bruno Dallago (Univ. of Trento), Menno Fenger (Erasmus University, Rotterdam), Anuska Ferligoj (Univ. of Ljubljana), Max Haller (Univ. of Graz), John Higley (Univ. of Texas, Austin), Ildikó Husz (HUN-REN GKAC), Michal Illner (Inst. of Sociology, CAS, Prague), Csaba Jelinek (CEU), Zúza Kusa (Inst. of Sociology, SAS, Bratislava), Olga Kutsenko (Univ. of Kiev), Mihály Laki (HUN-REN IS), David Lane (Univ. of Cambridge), Mladen Lazic (Univ. of Beograd), József Péter Martin (TI, Budapest), Attila Melegh (CUB), Maria Nawojczyk (Univ. AGH, Cracow), Vadim Radaev (High School of Economics, Moscow), Jose Real-Dato (Univ. Almeira), Kinga Szabó-Tóth (Univ. Miskolc), Judit Takács (HUN-REN IS), Károly Takács (Linköping Univ.), István György Tóth (Tárki, Budapest), Camelia Florela Voinea (Univ. of Bucharest)
Formal and informal volunteering in Hungary. Similairities and differences
Éva Perpék
Abstract
There are several studies on volunteerism in Hungary but its formal (organizational) and informal (non-organizational) statistical differentiation has still not been in focus yet. Two comprehensive questions of my article are the following: is there a real, “qualitative” difference between Hungarian formal and informal volunteers. If yes, which is the more up-to-date form contributing to community development and local development? My general hypothesis is that the group of organizational and non-organizational volunteers significantly differs from each other, and formal volunteerism is the frame which rather corresponds to current needs. This means that: (1) formal volunteerism is the type which strengthens frequency of activity more effectively; (2) it is preferred by higher social status holders; (3) and it is moved by “modern” motivations. These expectations are tested on databases recorded on voluntary work and donation in 1994 and 2005. The hypotheses are essentially confirmed, the contradictions are discussed in more detail below.
Keywords
formal and informal volunteerism, community development, human, cultural and social capital, motivation